• Facebook has protected groups. Transgenders, gays, and women are considered protected groups. Others may exist.

    You can say nothing disparaging against those protected groups. If you do you face a prolonged banishment from Facebook.

    However, white males are fair game. I had complained repeatedly about disparaging remarks against white males, or males of any color, and was always told it was well within community standards. There was one feminist site that advocated the castration of all males and even promoted reducing them by any means to 10%, yet, those sites were said to be well within community standards.

    I have deleted my Facebook accounts. They are gone and I hope that I can refrain from activating them within the fourteen day limit it takes to delete them.

    Facebook is an addiction. It will be difficult to refrain from reactivating my accounts. I still have Twitter, Tumblr, and Google as sites to publish my blog. I hope that will suffice. Withdrawal, I expect, will be arduous.

  • Sometimes I want to write and nothing comes. Other times a topic rises from the sewage around me, but alas, I am away from my computer, and then the topic seems to submerge itself back into the black ooze. 

    A lot of times I want to write about a topic but I consider how it will affect the reader. This should not be a concern, but it is. This problem must be overcome as I do not want to cater to an audience, but feel also one is necessary. Writing in a vacuum, as I have most of the time, hearing only crickets upon publishing a piece, can be disappointing. I guess most people expect you to write in agreement with them, otherwise they disregard you. There are many posters that do post to please, never varying their perspectives from that gathered by polling their audience, or by that gained by holding a moistened finger in the air. Look and see, those are the most popular sites online, they publish what people want to hear. Popular public opinion, the fad at the moment, that is what you see in their posts. I consider such sites so very dull and humdrum.

    Sometimes I force a post, knowing there will be no response. Writing to make sure there is a post that week. I have the ability to write about a can of beans and make it work… at least for me.

    I rail against progressive issues that really aren’t progressive but instead promote some pet desire of the promulgator. That garners much disdain from those who follow the latest trends, or are unaware of the ramifications of what they accept from these “progressives”. Some people seem unaware that there are a few “progressive” issues that will result in their own extinction… the one about diversification, for example, means white males must be gone.

    All the sensitivities today. Most often people are overly sensitive about that which they should not be, and not sensitive enough about that they should be. I think “snowflake” was a word combination made to label those who are overly sensitive, though it too is used incorrectly to label people who simply disagree with your point of view. Many of the topics I write about are issues people should be paying attention to, but because of sensitivities, cowardice, or simply “trying to get along”, they shun these issues. If the issues were talked about instead, debated, they might dissolve and become non-issues.

    Racism, bigotry, and many other faults are on display daily online. Many times the very people crying “racism” commit racism during their outcry. For example stating “all white people are privileged”, is a racist proclamation often not seen for what it is. Yet, no one will accept an opposing point of view to this assertion. Isn’t that bigotry?

    Well, I wander….

  • Although there are many paths there is also a precipice. None of them are easy to see. You might find that on any of them that you cannot go back. There are crossroads, all one way, upon which big changes could transpire. On any of these paths except the precipice, there could be hidden dangers just over the horizon… with no side path upon which to escape. There is no stopping.

    Everyone is faced with choices. Some positive, some negative. Occasionally it is a simple matter of math… one path hurts many, another hurts few. Often those are the only options. It would be nice if there were only options where no one got hurt.

    Is it better to maintain the status quo rather than hurting others or destroying yourself? Life seems contrary to that option. Someone usually ends up paying for choices in life, one way or another.

    Inexorably time flows. Mistakes made cannot be erased or corrected. They stand as testimony to your decisions. Future choices are based on them. It all builds like some mountain. Most often you find yourself at the bottom of that pile.

    Dreary? Well there are times of glee. They seem to fade. Memories of the dreary stand resolute, stark, and as detailed as when they occurred. A flaw, it seems, in the human mind. Only a few decent positive memories are strong enough to bear up against the march of the days. Worry keeps us connected to the dreary, though.

     

  • Assuming life occurs spontaneously via abiogenesis throughout the universe, can humanity possibly be indicative of what will be found on other worlds… as far as intelligent life forms? Are we to expect each life form to be as immoral, apathetic, and miserable has human beings?

    Every human is capable of lying, cheating, and stealing. If given the right circumstances every human is capable of murder. Is this the kind of being that inhabits the various nooks and crannies of the universe? Is there no hope of finding a creature, though it be wise and not gullible, also incapable of lying, cheating, or stealing? A kind of being that says something and means it. Someone you can trust to keep their word and not be swayed by someone offering a bribe. Someone who obeys the law, assuming the laws are good, even when no one else is looking. For example, someone who in the middle of the night when no one else is on the street… still obeys the speed limit.

    As is, no human can be trusted to do what they say they will do. “Trust no one” is the meme of the day, weeks, years, decades, etc.

    I honestly cannot see how evolution can produce such a superior creature. Since no such creature exists on this earth it can be presumed that evolution produced all creatures. The only hope for such a creature to exist would be one that is artificial, a construct. Extreme care would need to be taken to insure that it would not be contaminated by human behaviorisms. Refinement would have to be an ongoing measure afterwards, with machine producing machine… refined to moral perfection.

  • So, it is revealed. All these women that are trying to take down prominent men are part of an organized group that coordinate their efforts via conference calls. They have a list of certain celebrities and political targets. They utilize organized boycotts of sponsors to force compliance and to hurt these men financially. They have already hurt these men by coming forward with allegations. Due to the gynocentric nature of society, allegations are treated like prosecutions. The reputation of men are instantly ruined. Many are fired outright before even the merit of the allegations is determined.

    I do not know if they are part of the metoo group. They might as well be though, since the metoo group is supporting them.

  • One is not like the other, each is unique. Similarities exist, drawing some together, but there are always differences… it would be boring without them.

    When one group has differences that conflict with the differences of another group, there is always a problem. To what scale that problem rises depends on one or the other group insisting that the other change and adopt their differences.

    As long as they are separate, the differences are irrelevant. When circumstances arise causing one group to influx into the area of another, that is when violent conflict may arise. When the invading group will not change to accommodate the differences in their host group’s area, turmoil is guaranteed. Time may cure this unless the ideology of the invading group is resolute and renewing.  If the structure of the ideology of the invading group is rigid there are two ways it will resolve. Either the host will change, or the host will destroy the invader.

    Differences between groups will always insure that conflict will be present whenever the groups meet.

    This is how mankind stands today.

  • robot profile AMen lie, it is true, however, because many men are steeped in discipline, if not by military sources, but by the demands of society, more men than women are likely to speak the truth.

    Women have always been given special treatment by society, treatment in the same way children are given. Assumptions are also made about women by our gynocentric society. It is erroneously assumed that women are of a higher moral order. As traditional care givers they are given credit for possessing empathy and compassion over and above what a male can ever possess.

    Whereas it is not erroneous to think that most women are better at caring for children… that caring is only for children… for any others it is absent to a high degree and no higher than a man’s.

    Women twist the truth, or lie outright for many reasons. Sometimes it is the fear of punishment, men will do that too. Other times it is solely for the purposes of manipulating men. In that purpose women have refined the technique of lying to a fine art. Lies are used to get what they want. Be it the punishment of other men by manipulating some white knight into action, a white knight who mistakenly thinks he will gain sexual favors from the woman, or simply for the purposes of destroying a man, his career and life.

    The percentage of difference between men and women as to lying is small… yet I would assert without hesitation, that where men are concerned, women are more likely to lie than men.

  • The politically correct crowd are the most prolific of prevaricators today. They are expert at double-speak.

    While speaking against racism and bigotry, they use racism and bigotry. They speak of justice while committing injustices.

    They are out to change society into their concept of utopia and they do not care how many people have to be hurt or die or how many lies they have to tell to accomplish it.

    They are also called SJWs, social justice warriors.

    They speak of a desire for diversity, but that “diversity” is code for discrimination against white males. They commit injustices to correct what they “feel” is an injustice, not realizing that it involves eliminating free choice.

    The Politically correct and SJWs are the worst thing to come along since feminism, which used many of the same tactics to destroy men’s careers and lives.

     

  • ►The requirements of being a human being are too difficult.

    ►Feelings are an impediment to serenity.

    ►Conflict from misunderstandings is too frequent.

    ►Socialization is becoming frantic as some demand more and more “diversity”, meaning conflicting cultures, in groups.

    ►The discipline of human beings is highly questionable. They know what needs to be done but prefer to do only that which benefits them alone.