Genital Mutilation..Is it For Your Child? … August 26, 2013

The horrors of female circumcision are well-known. Why it is performed is usually due to cultural and religious reasons:
  • Hygienic and aesthetic. The external female genitalia are considered dirty and “unsightly” and should be flat, rigid and dry;
  • Sociological. Identification with the cultural traditions, as a rite of passage of girls into womanhood, and for the maintenance of social cohesion;
  • Psychological. Reduction of sensitive tissue and thus to curb sexual pleasure in order to maintain chastity and virginity, to guarantee women’s fidelity, and even to increase male sexual pleasure;
  • Myths and false beliefs. To enhance fertility and promote child survival; and
  • Religious. FGM/C has been practiced in a range of communities with different religions: Christian, Muslim and animist. Muslim communities often have the false belief that FGM/C is related to teachings of the Islamic law

The article first referenced above(The horrors of) estimates that about four girls a minute are mutilated worldwide. One reason for it is to reduce or eliminate the feelings of sexual arousal so as to avoid the possibility of premarital sexual activity. In this way the girl is kept “pure” until after marriage. Other reasons given for this practice can be found here.

Male genital mutilation has been a common practice even among the nonreligious growing to around ninety percent in the United States by the 1970s. (For the history of this practice go here) Since it is thought by many that the removal of the foreskin does little to lessen the sensitivity and arousal capability of the male it has been labeled exclusively as circumcision rather than the genital mutilation that it is.

Many reasons are given in support of circumcision. It is, however, medically, a totally unnecessary procedure. There are many risks involved in having the procedure done as well.

circumcision botchedPrompting this post is a story from the New York Times: “City Questions Circumcision Ritual After Baby Dies”. The Mohel, a circumciser utilized by some Jewish Orthodox groups, performs the delicate and dangerous procedure. As reported in the 2005 article out of the three cases seen, one infant died. Yet, even so, the practice continued and in 2012 we have a report of 11  herpes infected infants reported between 2000 and 2011.  This includes the one fatality. There have also been cases where a Mohel practitioner has caused in serious damage.   The possibility of serious injury can also occur in hospitals.

Do the benefits outweigh the risks? Most doctors say yes. Some doctors say the foreskin is a necessary organ. It developed as a result of the natural course of evolution. It performs necessary functions. Circumcision began as a religious practice and has been adopted as a matter of course by the general public. It’s time people realized that the foreskin developed as a natural part of evolution and that circumcision is an unnecessary practice that in fact carries risks. In any case the procedure should be carried out by a surgeon, not by religious sects, or Mohels, in barbaric ceremonies. Would you want Uncle Joe to remove your appendix, or a surgeon?

This entry was posted in Religion and Reason and tagged , . Bookmark the permalink.

4 Responses to Genital Mutilation..Is it For Your Child? … August 26, 2013

  1. olivierpascal says:

    I agree that it’s genital mutilation when done for non therapeutic reasons on an unconsenting patient but I’m not sure most doctors say the benefits outweigh the risks, even in genital cutting cultures.

  2. drenn1077 says:

    You know, I had that same thought. However, when I Googled the topic I could only find a couple sites at most that supported it. The rest were very pro-circumcision.

  3. olivierpascal says:

    Thanks for your answer. You might have the right impression but I found this following news reassuring considering that in the 1950s almost all newborn boys in Australia were circumcised: “Half of the Australian Doctor community believe that the circumcision of newborns is tantamount to child abuse and should never be performed, a survey reveals.
    Findings from an online poll show that 74% of those responding to the question ‘should parents be routinely offered circumcision for their newborns in the public system’ said no.
    Of these 51% likened the procedure to child abuse, while a further 23% said circumcision was a personal or religious choice and should only be available to parents of newborns in the private sector.”

  4. drenn1077 says:

    Only a partial article is available to the public. The rest is for Australian health practitioners only. Yes, it seems that at least the Australian health system has become more enlightened.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s